BharatPremi
11-07 12:31 PM
:pif DOL == funeral house
then
USCIS == Frying Pan :)
then
USCIS == Frying Pan :)
wallpaper cristiano ronaldo hairstyle
raysaikat
08-03 04:54 PM
Hi,
We filed a dependent I-485 for my wife while she is on a F1 status. She has a EAD card (but my I-140 is pending). My understanding is that once she finishes school, she will not be able to get an OPT. Does it mean that she can accept employment using the EAD even though the I-140 is not approved?
Yes.
In case my I-140 is denied, will she lose her status and would have to leave the country?
Thanks. Yes.
We filed a dependent I-485 for my wife while she is on a F1 status. She has a EAD card (but my I-140 is pending). My understanding is that once she finishes school, she will not be able to get an OPT. Does it mean that she can accept employment using the EAD even though the I-140 is not approved?
Yes.
In case my I-140 is denied, will she lose her status and would have to leave the country?
Thanks. Yes.
Macaca
06-19 07:30 AM
House Delays Thorny Energy Issues (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118221331128639861-search.html?KEYWORDS=immigration&COLLECTION=wsjie/6month) By John J. Fialka, The Wall Street Journal, 19 June 2007
WASHINGTON -- Facing a tight deadline imposed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democratic leaders of the Energy and Commerce Committee postponed until the fall House debates on several controversial energy issues, including tougher standards for automobile fuel efficiency.
It wasn't immediately clear what impact the House move toward a simplified, less-controversial energy measure will have on the Senate version of the bill. The Senate is scheduled to debate auto-efficiency standards and a mandate for coal-based liquid fuels on the floor this week.
Rep. John D. Dingell (D., Mich.), chairman of the House committee, and Rick Boucher (D., Va.) chairman of the subcommittee that is preparing its energy legislation, jointly announced they will focus on less-divisive issues, including energy-efficiency standards for appliances, improvements to the nation's electricity grid and incentives for use of wind power.
"This procedure . . . was discussed with the speaker, and she understands the rationale for proceeding this way," the two Democrat leaders said, "so we can rapidly work on a bipartisan bill that can be signed into law."
The turnaround by Rep. Dingell, who has defended Detroit automakers against fuel-saving standards for years, comes as automakers have launched a nationwide lobbying campaign to water down proposed tougher auto-efficiency standards. Rep. Dingell promised to return to the issue in the fall, when the committee is also planning legislation that would regulate carbon dioxide and other emissions that scientists say are accelerating global warming.
While the Senate appears to be pressing ahead, it could face filibuster threats on the auto-efficiency standards and several other items, requiring 60 votes to overcome, a margin that may not be attainable. "One of the questions being discussed is which body goes first with some of these things," a House aide said.
"We have decided to proceed with provisions that represent consensus," Messrs. Dingell and Boucher wrote. The energy subcommittee is scheduled to assemble its new version of the energy bill this week, and the House could debate the completed bill after the July 4 recess. Earlier, Speaker Pelosi (D., Calif.) had asked for an "Energy Independence" bill by July 4.
The House committee also deferred discussion of a low-carbon-fuel standard, similar to California's, which would mandate increasing use of ethanol and other fuels that result in lower CO2 emissions. Another postponed issue is a change in federal law that would block California from establishing its own CO2 emissions standards for vehicles.
The two committee leaders said they were postponing debate because the issues "are complex and difficult."
Democrats are deeply split, with representatives from auto-producing states fighting tougher emissions standards, and the California delegation and liberal factions pushing for them. Coal-state Democrats and environmentally inclined Democrats are on opposite sides over coal-to-liquid fuels, which would emphasize diesel and jet fuels made from coal, a fuel the U.S. has in abundance.
WASHINGTON -- Facing a tight deadline imposed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democratic leaders of the Energy and Commerce Committee postponed until the fall House debates on several controversial energy issues, including tougher standards for automobile fuel efficiency.
It wasn't immediately clear what impact the House move toward a simplified, less-controversial energy measure will have on the Senate version of the bill. The Senate is scheduled to debate auto-efficiency standards and a mandate for coal-based liquid fuels on the floor this week.
Rep. John D. Dingell (D., Mich.), chairman of the House committee, and Rick Boucher (D., Va.) chairman of the subcommittee that is preparing its energy legislation, jointly announced they will focus on less-divisive issues, including energy-efficiency standards for appliances, improvements to the nation's electricity grid and incentives for use of wind power.
"This procedure . . . was discussed with the speaker, and she understands the rationale for proceeding this way," the two Democrat leaders said, "so we can rapidly work on a bipartisan bill that can be signed into law."
The turnaround by Rep. Dingell, who has defended Detroit automakers against fuel-saving standards for years, comes as automakers have launched a nationwide lobbying campaign to water down proposed tougher auto-efficiency standards. Rep. Dingell promised to return to the issue in the fall, when the committee is also planning legislation that would regulate carbon dioxide and other emissions that scientists say are accelerating global warming.
While the Senate appears to be pressing ahead, it could face filibuster threats on the auto-efficiency standards and several other items, requiring 60 votes to overcome, a margin that may not be attainable. "One of the questions being discussed is which body goes first with some of these things," a House aide said.
"We have decided to proceed with provisions that represent consensus," Messrs. Dingell and Boucher wrote. The energy subcommittee is scheduled to assemble its new version of the energy bill this week, and the House could debate the completed bill after the July 4 recess. Earlier, Speaker Pelosi (D., Calif.) had asked for an "Energy Independence" bill by July 4.
The House committee also deferred discussion of a low-carbon-fuel standard, similar to California's, which would mandate increasing use of ethanol and other fuels that result in lower CO2 emissions. Another postponed issue is a change in federal law that would block California from establishing its own CO2 emissions standards for vehicles.
The two committee leaders said they were postponing debate because the issues "are complex and difficult."
Democrats are deeply split, with representatives from auto-producing states fighting tougher emissions standards, and the California delegation and liberal factions pushing for them. Coal-state Democrats and environmentally inclined Democrats are on opposite sides over coal-to-liquid fuels, which would emphasize diesel and jet fuels made from coal, a fuel the U.S. has in abundance.
2011 Cristiano Ronaldo Haircut
martinvisalaw
07-19 11:33 AM
Already answered where you posted it elsewhere on this board
more...
black_logs
01-24 07:28 PM
As a policy we call and verify each volunteer before we sign up. I will apreciate if you could send me an email with your contact numbers
black_logs@yahoo.com. Or PM me your contact info.
Thanks
Please sign me in for WA state. I live in Vancouver, WA.
black_logs@yahoo.com. Or PM me your contact info.
Thanks
Please sign me in for WA state. I live in Vancouver, WA.
eastindia
04-21 11:20 AM
Can someone ask their lawyers?
more...
snathan
03-02 06:13 PM
Hi, i have filed I-140 3 months back and it is still in process. Am I able to file I-485 in parallel to the I-140 now.
Whats your country of chargeability and category...
EB1 - Yes, you can
EB2- ROW - Yes
EB2 I/C - wait time is 3-5 years
EB3 I/C - wait time is 10-12 years
EB3 - ROW - wait time is 5-6 years.
Whats your country of chargeability and category...
EB1 - Yes, you can
EB2- ROW - Yes
EB2 I/C - wait time is 3-5 years
EB3 I/C - wait time is 10-12 years
EB3 - ROW - wait time is 5-6 years.
2010 c ronaldo hairstyles.
Administrator2
10-16 07:35 PM
.
more...
blacktongue
10-13 09:22 AM
ILW.COM - immigration news: Bloggings On Dysfunctional Government (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2010,1012-paparelli.shtm)
Check out questions for DOL and DHS
Does Senate answer questions posted on website of a lawyer?
When are the answers expected? Can someone find out from the lawyer. It is better for us to know the answers than the questions.
Check out questions for DOL and DHS
Does Senate answer questions posted on website of a lawyer?
When are the answers expected? Can someone find out from the lawyer. It is better for us to know the answers than the questions.
hair hairstyles cristiano ronaldo
hanuman1216
01-12 11:23 AM
Hi,
I am planning to travel to Indian in coming months. However, I have a stright outright dismissed CMIT case back in 2007. I got the non convincted case expunged. I got FBI finger print results and they say no records were found. I got BCI from state which states no records were found. Last time , I travelled abroad was in 2006. I have a valid AP.
Do you see any risk of re entrying US on AP?.
Your help is much appreciated as I have to have to be there in India.
Thank you.
- Hanuman
I am planning to travel to Indian in coming months. However, I have a stright outright dismissed CMIT case back in 2007. I got the non convincted case expunged. I got FBI finger print results and they say no records were found. I got BCI from state which states no records were found. Last time , I travelled abroad was in 2006. I have a valid AP.
Do you see any risk of re entrying US on AP?.
Your help is much appreciated as I have to have to be there in India.
Thank you.
- Hanuman
more...
voldemar
03-23 11:59 AM
next: Senate has to introduce their version
Senate can pick up House version after House voting.
Senate can pick up House version after House voting.
hot girlfriend christiano ronaldo hairstyles. cristiano ronaldo hairstyle pics.
tommui
06-24 09:43 PM
Hi
I jsut wondering which country/place got the strongest prospect for the multimedia industry... Australia/USA/Asia.......??
because I m thinking which places should I go to work if i want to work in this multimedia industry lets say for a couple of years..any suggestion??
(im just a very junior in this industry)
ThANKS
tOM
I jsut wondering which country/place got the strongest prospect for the multimedia industry... Australia/USA/Asia.......??
because I m thinking which places should I go to work if i want to work in this multimedia industry lets say for a couple of years..any suggestion??
(im just a very junior in this industry)
ThANKS
tOM
more...
house Christiano Ronaldo hairstyles
Blog Feeds
07-27 03:40 PM
US Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke, the former Governor of Washington state, was recently speaking to the Washington International Trade Association in his home state had some frank words about the impact visa denials and delays are having on US commerce: As we seek to open up markets for American companies abroad, the United States must also acknowledge that she has room to improve when it comes to increasing the secure flow of goods, services and people across our own borders. In particular, the United States often makes it too difficult for foreign company executives to enter here to do...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/secretary-of-commerce-admits-visa-processing-at-consulates-is-hurting-the-country.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/secretary-of-commerce-admits-visa-processing-at-consulates-is-hurting-the-country.html)
tattoo Cristiano Ronaldo has fueled
muthiahmerchant
08-28 01:53 PM
Hi All,
I am trying to change my wife from H1B to H4. There is this question in I539 for which I am not sure how to reply,
If you answered "Yes" to Question 3g in Part 4 on Page 3 of this form, fully describe the employment. Include the name of theperson employed, name and address of the employer, weekly income and whether the employment was specifically authorized byUSCIS.
would something of this sort be enough
I, xyz am working as a Systems Analyst with abc Inc. My job responsibilities include blah blah.
abc Inc is located at blah.
I am drawing a monthly salary of $xxx. A weekly income based on monthly salary would be $xxx
The employment was authorized by USCIS, the receipt number is EAC-xxxx
I am trying to change my wife from H1B to H4. There is this question in I539 for which I am not sure how to reply,
If you answered "Yes" to Question 3g in Part 4 on Page 3 of this form, fully describe the employment. Include the name of theperson employed, name and address of the employer, weekly income and whether the employment was specifically authorized byUSCIS.
would something of this sort be enough
I, xyz am working as a Systems Analyst with abc Inc. My job responsibilities include blah blah.
abc Inc is located at blah.
I am drawing a monthly salary of $xxx. A weekly income based on monthly salary would be $xxx
The employment was authorized by USCIS, the receipt number is EAC-xxxx
more...
pictures cristiano ronaldo haircut
mamsie1
07-14 02:55 PM
I have an H1B approval from USCIS, and I am trying to go to Canada for the initial visa stamping. But then i have a problem. I initially entered the country as a visitor, and married a citizen, but only after my I-94 had expired for about a week. (My petition is still pending. The company I am working for could not wait for my greencard, since its already been years since I started that process, so they went ahead and applied for the H1B visa for me). I heard that it is a problem to do the visa stamping in Canada if you have been out of status before. Is it advisable to go to Canada for the visa stamping?:confused:
dresses cristiano ronaldo hairstyle
indian111
09-20 02:13 PM
My attorney asked me to send a copy of my GC to make sure the info is correctly printed. Is it ok send it to them?
more...
makeup cristiano ronaldo hairstyle
dannyypk
04-05 03:36 PM
Recently I filed a H1-B Part time Visa. I received the notice from the Lawyer that my application got a RFE on it.
Will they usually show the status online? When I check USCIS, it does not say my case had a RFE on it.
Please advice! Thanks!
Will they usually show the status online? When I check USCIS, it does not say my case had a RFE on it.
Please advice! Thanks!
girlfriend dresses cristiano ronaldo
sachin1sharma
10-29 08:59 PM
Hi,
I have a question about H1B transfer. I joined a company A on h1b in may 2005 and did an H1B transfer on july 2006 to company B. Now INS has sent an RFE (for company B financial). I have submitted all the relevant documents when I joined company B for H1B transfer so my credentials are crystal clear. Now when the comhpany B sends a response to INS and if H1B does not get approved. Would I be able to do an H1B transfer to any other company. I spoke to one company they are saying that since the RFE is on the company's credibility so they can do an transfer provided if we submit all the paystubs which we got from company B. I have been working for a client and have all the recent paystubs. Please advice.
Sachin.
I have a question about H1B transfer. I joined a company A on h1b in may 2005 and did an H1B transfer on july 2006 to company B. Now INS has sent an RFE (for company B financial). I have submitted all the relevant documents when I joined company B for H1B transfer so my credentials are crystal clear. Now when the comhpany B sends a response to INS and if H1B does not get approved. Would I be able to do an H1B transfer to any other company. I spoke to one company they are saying that since the RFE is on the company's credibility so they can do an transfer provided if we submit all the paystubs which we got from company B. I have been working for a client and have all the recent paystubs. Please advice.
Sachin.
hairstyles cristiano ronaldo haircut
nixstor
10-27 01:29 PM
Can you AC21 portability be used for more than one employer?
What if some one decides to stop working and go back to school?
What if some one decides to stop working and go back to school?
jack
10-29 06:14 PM
Hello everyone,
I obtained my F1 visa in Aug,2001 for 5 years and I initially came here for M.S. I have continued for PhD in 2003 and visited India every two years. My F1 expired in Jul,2006 but my I-20 is valid until Dec,2008.The real problem is that I have applied for Canadian PR this Oct and expecting to get it by Oct,2008.
Once I get my PR, I have to go to Canada for Visa stamping and my questions are related to this:
1) Since my F1 expired, Can I come back to US after PR stamping, without needing an F1 visa.?
2) Is it advisable to get my F1 visa stamping in India or Canada next year i.e in Oct 2008, or would it be too late? (since that would be two years after visa expiry).
PS: I wanted to get my F1 stamping only if it were necessary to go to India.
Any suggestions would help me a lot and thanks so much in advance.
I obtained my F1 visa in Aug,2001 for 5 years and I initially came here for M.S. I have continued for PhD in 2003 and visited India every two years. My F1 expired in Jul,2006 but my I-20 is valid until Dec,2008.The real problem is that I have applied for Canadian PR this Oct and expecting to get it by Oct,2008.
Once I get my PR, I have to go to Canada for Visa stamping and my questions are related to this:
1) Since my F1 expired, Can I come back to US after PR stamping, without needing an F1 visa.?
2) Is it advisable to get my F1 visa stamping in India or Canada next year i.e in Oct 2008, or would it be too late? (since that would be two years after visa expiry).
PS: I wanted to get my F1 stamping only if it were necessary to go to India.
Any suggestions would help me a lot and thanks so much in advance.
jerez_z
05-28 01:00 AM
well done, but I was curious as to any particular reason you decided to write haylow as opposed the the shorter easier more correct halo?
leet isn't cool
leet isn't cool
No comments:
Post a Comment